Gracefulone, I agree her scores had to be up there, I would love to know what they were as well. If just to see how the scoring compared today.  These days the scoring seems higher then it did even a few years ago. I wonder if it is because gymnasts are better technically or because the system has become more leniant.
Bog, I learn something new here everyday as well  . I always love hearing and learning about the system in Canada (and everywhere for that matter), it is one of the coolest things about the CB to me.
Nastia really did do a very lovely job here. She certainly would have stood out to me all around. I loved seeing these routines, and how they have changed over the years - I think its great that we have the same bar routine today. Thank goodness they removed the cartwheel from the beam routine & the aerial cartwheel from the floor LOL. I do think that our routines now are a bit more jerky, less balletic - if that makes sense, and I really enjoyed the dance in the older routines.
I imagine that Level 4 was not usual or perhaps not even available at that time?? (I am not certain when it became a competition level), regardless I am glad that the majority (as far as I know) did compete in the compulsories (L5 & 6). I also know of many girls today that competed unsuccessfully (by todays standards) at those levels & are still around to laugh about it - quite successfully as L10's - today.  I think that there is a happy medium to training compulsories while still training on an elite track & if parents can be patient (I agree it is, and should not be, all about the winning) and deal with it for a couple of years the girls would actually remain in the sport longer. So many don't even make it past L5 these days because this is their 4th or 5th year competing (and they are still L5's) and they are just done. Too many gyms spend ridiculous amounts of time perfecting compuls. floor routines, and not enough time training on bars. Gym programs need at least equal quality bar time.
|