G
gracefulone
For me the movies aren't as big of a deal. No matter how great the cast/director/effects are, they still must ruin the book. Harry Potter is not alone. Pretty much every based-on-the-book movie has strayed from the storyline to create more drama, more quickly. Only exception I can drum up right now: Charlotte's Web. It's exactly the same, right down to the last, "salutations" I did not see the Dakota Fanning version, but the original is perfect. The Notebook may (half) count, because no movie could ever capture the emotion of the novel.
Number one ruined by the movie book of the moment: Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants. Those books are amazing and they...deleted a character from the movie who becomes very very very important in the rest of the series. I expect I will only become more annoyed with the following three movies, which I will at some point see, if only to fuel my anger towards film makers. Luckily the books are only a foursome.
So another interesting (though somewhat predictable if you've actually read this) fact about me: I cannot stand when books are (inaccurately) made into movies. Which is why I am desperately crossing my fingers about the on-screen interpretation of Jodi Picoult's My Sister's Keeper.
Number one ruined by the movie book of the moment: Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants. Those books are amazing and they...deleted a character from the movie who becomes very very very important in the rest of the series. I expect I will only become more annoyed with the following three movies, which I will at some point see, if only to fuel my anger towards film makers. Luckily the books are only a foursome.
So another interesting (though somewhat predictable if you've actually read this) fact about me: I cannot stand when books are (inaccurately) made into movies. Which is why I am desperately crossing my fingers about the on-screen interpretation of Jodi Picoult's My Sister's Keeper.
Last edited by a moderator: