1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Rules you would change?

Discussion in 'Men's Artistic Gymnastics (MAG)' started by rosiekat, Mar 5, 2018.

  1. rosiekat

    rosiekat Member Proud Parent

    Messages:
    343
    Likes Received:
    503
    Country:
    USA USA
    This is obviously just for fun, as I'm assuming none of us has any authority here!

    I was thinking last night that at least once you hit about L6, they should divide competition into how many years you've done that level. So, instead of having a division like L6/D1/8-9, you'd have L6/1st year or L6/2nd year. I feel like L4 and L5 aren't uncommon to do in 1 year, which is why I didn't include them - but once you hit 6, it's almost a given that you'll take 2 years at least.

    Any thoughts on this, or how you would change things?
     
    MILgymFAM likes this.

  2. John

    John Active Member Proud Parent

    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    1,637
    Country:
    USA USA
    I would add a difficulty score to JO scoring. I am not sure if it should be added as a bonus or simply do what FIG does and have difficulty and execution scores.
     
    tpMom and MILgymFAM like this.
  3. skschlag

    skschlag Well-Known Member CBBC Board Member Proud Parent

    Messages:
    8,974
    Likes Received:
    12,636
    Country:
    USA USA
    MAG already has this :)
     
    Hollowarchkick, sce and amiandjim like this.
  4. John

    John Active Member Proud Parent

    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    1,637
    Country:
    USA USA
    Lucky for MAG. I wonder why the difference?
     

  5. skschlag

    skschlag Well-Known Member CBBC Board Member Proud Parent

    Messages:
    8,974
    Likes Received:
    12,636
    Country:
    USA USA
    No clue, although most of the US would like gymnatics to go back to the perfect 10. I like the way MAG does it as it challenges my son to keep working on his skills....
     
    sce likes this.
  6. John

    John Active Member Proud Parent

    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    1,637
    Country:
    USA USA
    Oh, I hate the perfect 10. I think it is what causes so much confusion and causing much grief trying to understand the sport. I think it is a good idea to let the athlete determine execution or difficulty. In the perfect world, you would have both, nothing is perfect.
     
  7. Jard.the.gymnast

    Jard.the.gymnast Verified Coach Verified Coach Gymnast

    Messages:
    720
    Likes Received:
    484
    Country:
    Netherlands Netherlands
    I would remove upper age limits
     
    PinPin and BachFlyer like this.
  8. alongfortheride

    alongfortheride Member Proud Parent

    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    85
    Country:
    USA USA
    Get rid of Division 2 at levels 6 and 7.

    Have 2 judges for each event and average the scores together.

    Allow for 2 vaults like the girls.
     
    gymboymom, PinPin, sjm2b3 and 4 others like this.
  9. samsmama

    samsmama Active Member Proud Parent

    Messages:
    770
    Likes Received:
    831
    Country:
    USA USA
    That's interesting, I wonder if it varies by region. At least at the gyms DS has gone to, it's much more common to repeat L4 and L5. Out of the boys he competed L6 with last season, I can't think of any in our state who are repeating 6. Most went to 7, a couple older boys went to 8 or JD, and a few left the sport. Coaches seem to want to move the older boys with L6+ skills up to optionals/JD as quickly as possible, so it's mostly the 12 & under kids in L7.
     
    sce and profmom like this.
  10. Rockygym

    Rockygym Active Member Proud Parent

    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    782
    Country:
    USA USA
    Do away with the "age" date in MAG and do the age divisions at meets more like WAG
     
    M2Abi, BachFlyer and sjm2b3 like this.
  11. Juniper311

    Juniper311 Member Proud Parent

    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    67
    Country:
    USA USA
    2 judges would raise the cost of the meet. I’m quite happy not to.

    I understand why so many people think D2 is a waste for level 7... I personally kind of agree in spirit about that, though I disagree it is a waste for level 6. But since 7 is still compulsory, it looks better to treat it the same as the other compulsory levels. If you’re going to D2 any compulsory level, you’re gonna have to D2 them all or it really will look like you’re treating some kids differently.
     
  12. amiandjim

    amiandjim Active Member Proud Parent Former Gymnast

    Messages:
    962
    Likes Received:
    1,938
    Country:
    USA USA
    I actually proposed something like this for girls’ compulsories. Someone on Facebook proposed a score that would force girls to move up a level (ex: over 37, you have to move up). I didn’t like that idea bc individual circumstances can vary, so I suggested having 2 separate divisions, one for first time level girls and one for repeaters.
     
  13. rosiekat

    rosiekat Member Proud Parent

    Messages:
    343
    Likes Received:
    503
    Country:
    USA USA
    My comment was based only on my admittedly limited experience. I think we have some who skipped 7 and we definitely had a crop of JDs last year. Anyone with just about any experience in this world knows more than I do, so take my words with a large grain of salt!
     
  14. profmom

    profmom Well-Known Member CB Booster Club Proud Parent

    Messages:
    8,727
    Likes Received:
    14,916
    Country:
    USA USA
    Honestly, I just don't see the point of L7 D2. I don't think that all the compulsory levels have to be the same.

    Get rid of the swing to handstand requirement for L9. (My son has it, but it's a difficult and frustrating expectation for pre-pubertal boys.)
    Allow but do not require two vaults.
    Reconfigure nationals so that the percentage of each level making it is either the same or tilted in favor of L10.
    Invest in anything that will help the growth of the college club gym movement, since it looks like NCAA isn't coming back.
     
    PinPin, sce, gymmomx2 and 1 other person like this.
  15. Low-Bar

    Low-Bar New Member Proud Parent

    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    30
    Country:
    USA USA
    Because Junior FIG scoring is now used for both L9 and L10....scoring and rules for all those kids is comparable (except for the dismount scoring differences in L9 and L10)....it would be an easy time to re-"band" the age groupings for levels. With consistent scoring across L9/L10 paired with the new quad's "age advancement" (May birthday cutoff), I would like to seem them reconfigure the level/age bands to L10 16-18; L9 14-15; L8 12-13. The leap from L6 to L8 and L7 to L8 is pretty dramatic, so it would help cushion that jump with an extra year...maybe keep a few more athletes in the sport. You could also make exceptions and let thriving 13s and 15s "level up" to L9 ad L10 early, particularly those who are ready to take on the more advanced element group requirements and "C" and "D" dismounts. They could level up by meeting a min threshold at November and December meets. The age advancement thing isn't likely to go away next quad unless USAG adopts a philosophy that moves away from focusing all rules, scoring and ages as preparation for international junior elite competition. Based on what national junior team coordinator has said, like many things done by USAG, the birth cutoff was done with only about 0.1% of the MAG population in mind....the very best of the Junior Elites so they come closer to matching the international standard. The "ideal birthday cutoff would have gone all the way to a fall month, vice May, to be perfectly aligned with the FIG age cutoff....May was a way to split the difference and it matched up with the end of the JO season and did not create a full 12-13 month age cutoff jump."
     
    profmom likes this.
  16. Cheryl

    Cheryl New Member

    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    9
    Country:
    USA USA
    Remove upper age limits, or go to a different cut off where kids aren’t competing a year older than their actual age. For boys there’s a big physical strength difference between 12 and 14. The upper limits push the younger guys do to strength moves they can’t perform prior to puberty because they need to be “in age” group before their bodies are ready.

    Get rid of D2 at Levels 6 and 7. Just one group where you can do bonuses on whichever events you can. Most guys in these groups can do a couple bonuses here and there.
     
  17. profmom

    profmom Well-Known Member CB Booster Club Proud Parent

    Messages:
    8,727
    Likes Received:
    14,916
    Country:
    USA USA
    Yes, Low-Bar! I understand that the national committee wants better international results, but I don't think the solution is to wrench the whole program around to benefit the tiny number of young guys who are being aimed at elite gymnastics from around age 8. With growth in the number of athletes, better retention as they get to be teenagers, and stronger programming/more opportunities for guys in their late teens and early 20s, I think we'd see both a more satisfying experience for the large number of guys in the sport who do not have elite ambitions and the growth of a pool of potential elite athletes -- some of whom may not realize they are part of that pool until after puberty!
     
    2G1B and gymmomx2 like this.
  18. Madden3

    Madden3 Member Proud Parent

    Messages:
    435
    Likes Received:
    1,010
    Country:
    USA USA
    I believe this (increasing opportunity for adult gymnasts (over 18) to stay in the sport) is the only change that will bring MAG back. US MAG is currently a sport with little to no opportunity to train or compete at all, at any level of ability, after HS. This makes it different than virtually all other even slightly popular sports. Adults can do most other sports, with relatively little expense, for fun, health, and friendly competition. There is of course also far more opportunity to seriously train and compete past HS in most other sports.

    Gymnastics is very expensive compared to other sports and there are many other far less difficult sports boys and young men can excel in. Like it or not, parents with athletically talented kids are less likely to keep their kids in a sport where there are very few college teams at all, let alone scholarships, and basically no other opportunities except the current club system, which has a few problems.

    Also, if international success is the goal, how does it make sense to keep focusing on younger and younger kids when generally speaking, international champions in MAG are consistently well into their 20s when they achieve their personal bests? And don't you think pushing these harder skills that are meant for mature bodies lower and lower in ages are likely to increase career-ending injuries before the peak performance age range?

    Everyone wonders why WAG in US is so much better than MAG, internationally. To me it is obvious. Numbers and training opportunity. Period. So the key to more consistent international performance for US MAG is increasing overall numbers and training opportunity.

    Provide more opportunity after HS and you will see more kids motivated to stay in the sport and the development of more and better MAG dedicated coaches. More kids want to be in the sport, more gyms will provide MAG training. This is how you bring a sport back. By fixing (or coming up with a solid alternative) to what went wrong in the first place. Not by monkeying around with ages and levels.

    How to do this? I am not sure. I agree, MAG college teams will not come back under current law. An alternate solution would include the club system but would have to get beyond what club system currently can offer.
     
  19. 2G1B

    2G1B Active Member Proud Parent

    Messages:
    2,003
    Likes Received:
    1,807
    Country:
    USA USA
    I so agree with this. For those who know way more than me, does the women's side have the age cut offs with FIG rules? I assume so and that that is why TOPS/HOPES has the age cut offs that they have; but they don't then apply that to every kid across the board in JO, it is just for those select few kids who are at least training to possibly do elite one day (via TOPS/HOPES). Other than that there is no age specified by USAG.

    Along those lines, I'd do away with the upper age limits for L8 and L9.

    For the boys, I'd also like the option of a 2nd vault.
     

Share This Page