Coaches A theory regarding knee structure and tumbling development

DON'T LURK... Join The Discussion!

Members see FEWER ads

their athlete selection is based in science and very precise. truly this is not a coincidence. i'm sure valentin is more than familiar with russian talent selection. it is/was all based in physical science which included anthropometric, anthropomorphic, and morphological charactertics and measurements.

as i posted late last night somewhere here about what does it take to be a talented gymnast. it's 99% human biology. 1% everything else.

valentin, are you familiar with the "invert" test that the chinese use? i can expound further if you would like.
 
their athlete selection is based in science and very precise. truly this is not a coincidence. i'm sure valentin is more than familiar with russian talent selection. it is/was all based in physical science which included anthropometric, anthropomorphic, and morphological charactertics and measurements.

as i posted late last night somewhere here about what does it take to be a talented gymnast. it's 99% human biology. 1% everything else.

valentin, are you familiar with the "invert" test that the chinese use? i can expound further if you would like.

I'd like to hear it.
 
have the athlete hang on the bar in eagle grip. then slowly, slide their hands in until they come together and touch. then hang there with their hands/outside of the hands touching and comfortably hanging. if they can do so, you have a candidate for L-grip invert giants.

sorry, was interupted by a phone call.

if you have noticed recent trends, male gymnasts are more likely to "higgins" roll, or a roll of some sort, into inverts or L-grip. only a few every year will "jamb". there is a historical reason for this.

only a handful of girls have "jambed" to inverts or L-grip. their consistent choice of entry is also a "higgins" roll. memmel "jambing" to invert and pama " "stooping" for german giants are unique to their anatomy. you cannot expect to have a general population of children doing these skills and even after everything a coach knows how to do and will impart to their athletes.

if my generation of coaches knew the invert test...we would not have trashed shoulders ie; torn rotators & torn ac joints today. my generation is a living testament that not all of us should have been "jambing" into inverts or even doing "eagle" giants. and in my day, only a select few did german & czech giants.

todays female athletes have experienced an uptick in torn labrums of the shoulder. female gymnasts did not tear labrums prior to invert work. it was almost unheard of at one time.

going into these extreme positions cause the shoulder to "sublux". being anatomically predisposed is not enough but also must be very strong in this position to prevent injury, both boys and girls. you see, it's not just the flexibility. it is the strength in that flexibility to sustain the forces that are placed on the body and its proximal joints. most will never be anatomically predisposed, and most will never achieve the strength required at the shoulder to sustain a consistent level of performance. this is where human biology comes in. no matter what a coach knows or does will change what certain body types will learn. once a coach accepts this simple scientific fact, then a coach who is a student of the sport can carry on with an athlete in making good decisions about skill selection. example: why would you waste precious time teaching a slow muscle twitched ectomorph a double back on floor? better to teach a triple twist which is better suited to that athlete's biology. i hope this point is understood.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dunno...Point understood loud and clear..thanks for the reply. All very interesting, and yeah i would agree with it.
 
Excellent points, dunno.

Too bad the men's code essentially requires inverts in order to compete high bar; what skills would you use to fulfill that element group requirement for gymnasts who don't have the shoulders for it?
 
Valentin, your elbows sound like mine. They were that way before gymnastics and I attribute it to bicep curling before gym. Roger said he was able to stretch his out (he was a late starter as well) but I've never had much luck in that.

One of our compulsory coaches like to stretch out a few of her L6 with that knee stretch. Guess what happened when they learned front pike salto and landed. And the kid had a problem ever after with it.

Dumb, just for a stupid split leap. She had a good line already in her leg.
 

New Posts

DON'T LURK... Join The Discussion!

Members see FEWER ads

Gymnaverse :: Recent Activity

College Gym News

New Posts

Back