- Moderator
- #1
It seems to me that hurdle styles can be roughly split into three catgeories:
1) Arms reaching upward, as close to vertical as reasonably possible (seems to be the most standard approach)
2) Arms reaching forward (I believe this style is favored by Tony Retrosi, among others)
3) Arms off-set, with the dominant arm up and the alternate arm forward (I first heard about this from this video, and have since seen it work wonders for crooked tumblers)
Thoughts/preferences?
In general, I'd say I've bounced between #2 and #3 as being the preferred method (lately I've tended to default to #2, but use #3 as go-to for crooked tumblers). My gut instinct is that #1 would provide superior angular momentum, but not as much linear momentum (though I don't have the necessary expertise in biomechanics to calculate that specifically); I think as a general rule, linear momentum is more important than angular momentum in an accelerator skill such as a backhandspring, so I've tended to shy away from #1.
Anyway, what think y'all?
1) Arms reaching upward, as close to vertical as reasonably possible (seems to be the most standard approach)
2) Arms reaching forward (I believe this style is favored by Tony Retrosi, among others)
3) Arms off-set, with the dominant arm up and the alternate arm forward (I first heard about this from this video, and have since seen it work wonders for crooked tumblers)
Thoughts/preferences?
In general, I'd say I've bounced between #2 and #3 as being the preferred method (lately I've tended to default to #2, but use #3 as go-to for crooked tumblers). My gut instinct is that #1 would provide superior angular momentum, but not as much linear momentum (though I don't have the necessary expertise in biomechanics to calculate that specifically); I think as a general rule, linear momentum is more important than angular momentum in an accelerator skill such as a backhandspring, so I've tended to shy away from #1.
Anyway, what think y'all?